TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Could be the company invested in custom SP development that breaks if
they "upgrade" to a newer release.
Could just be the general large-organization resistance to upgrading
without a compelling reason.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> Can anyone venture a guess as to why my employerâa Fortune 500 company
> known as a "document company"âwould elect to deploy SharePoint Server 2007
> on any large-scale project? That is, are there valid reasons for having
> chosen SPS 2010 or 2013? Curious minds would like to know....
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com