Re: most effective method for SME review?

Subject: Re: most effective method for SME review?
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:00:59 +0200

Inline comments in Confluence (a newish feature, though previously
available using the Talk plugin). It's quite similar to shared review
in Acrobat, which I often couldn't get to work on a shared file.

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Tom Johnson <tomjohnson1492 -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> What has been your most effective method for reviewing docs with subject
> matter experts? I feel like I've tried everything and haven't really hit
> upon the best way of doing it.
> Some approaches I've tried:
> - comments forms on web pages
> - direct edits of source files on Github
> - in-person visits at my desk
> - email
> - JIRA tickets
> - Word docs
> - comments on PDFs
> - Google docs
> - Beegit
> - focused meetings
> - over-the-shoulder sessions
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


most effective method for SME review?: From: Tom Johnson

Previous by Author: Re: Partial Screenshot Indicators
Next by Author: Re: most effective method for SME review?
Previous by Thread: Re: most effective method for SME review?
Next by Thread: Re: most effective method for SME review?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads