Re: most effective method for SME review?

Subject: Re: most effective method for SME review?
From: "Peter Neilson" <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:08:59 -0400

On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:45:31 -0400, David Artman <david -at- davidartman -dot- com> wrote:

... info about what is changed on each change. ...

I've found that the problem with marking the changes is that nobody ever catches the stale item you FAILED to change, and it's now wrong because you left it alone. Worse, if only the SME knew that it changed, and never told you.

Nearly all SMEs and many other reviewers feel, "I don't want to see the parts I reviewed last time. Show me only the new stuff."

No, I don't have a good solution for that problem.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
RE: most effective method for SME review?: From: David Artman

Previous by Author: Re: most effective method for SME review?
Next by Author: Re: Need advanced DIR list
Previous by Thread: Re: most effective method for SME review?
Next by Thread: RE: most effective method for SME review?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads