Re: Developments in the review cycle

Subject: Re: Developments in the review cycle
From: kcbillb2 <kcbillb2 -at- kc -dot- rr -dot- com>
To: Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 08:19:17 -0500

Good description, Peter...:)


On 4/6/2016 6:20 AM, Peter Neilson wrote:

On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 01:07:42 -0400, Erika Yanovich <ERIKA_y -at- rad -dot- com> wrote:

In the "good old days", tech writers followed the Outline-First draft-Second-draft-Camera ready model. We would submit an entire publication for review (perhaps with some minor TBDs inside) and the world was a simpler place.

What I see nowadays is more dynamic: partial drafts (or bunch of topics) sent to different reviewers at different times. The stages are blurred and the follow-up more complicated.

I know some of you don't believe in complete publications anymore, just in separate topics that get compiled daily (or whenever) into a larger entity, but publications are still alive and kicking out there.

So my questions are:
1. Do you also see this transformation?
2. If yes, how do you cope with it?
3. Should we manage each chunk separately according to the old model (sounds a bit crazy) or replace the old model with a new one?

Model seen recently:
- Bring contract tech writer in for last-minute assistance.
- Ask TW to "clean up" existing copy and add new stuff.
- Reject any planning activity--not enough time.
- Ask TW to read expert's mind to discover new stuff.
- Reject any use of time for cleaning up anything.
- Decide TW was unnecessary.

Elapsed time? One week. Billable time? Two days.

Fundamental reward to TW: Knowledge of exciting new technology.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as kcbillb2 -at- kc -dot- rr -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Developments in the review cycle: From: Erika Yanovich
Re: Developments in the review cycle: From: Peter Neilson

Previous by Author: Re: Temp agencies and job boards for local tech writers
Next by Author: Re: Developments in the review cycle
Previous by Thread: Re: Developments in the review cycle
Next by Thread: RE: Developments in the review cycle


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads