Re: HATT Matrix

Subject: Re: HATT Matrix
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 09:38:36 -0700

Good riddance. It was paid advertising and consequently omitted some
of the most popular tools. It was further misleading since it just
repeated vendors' claims rather than testing whether the features
actually worked.

This is a useful survey of tools:

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:51 AM, Char James-Tanny <charjtf -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> Sorry, HAT Matrix is no longer online for a variety of reasons.
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


HATT Matrix: From: Damien Braniff
Re: HATT Matrix: From: Char James-Tanny

Previous by Author: Re: LinkedIn job listings - any tweaks available for bettersuggestions ?
Next by Author: Re: HATT Matrix
Previous by Thread: Re: HATT Matrix
Next by Thread: Re: HATT Matrix

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads