TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Request to take survey From:"Stuart Burnfield" <slb -at- westnet -dot- com -dot- au> To:"Techwr-l" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Sun, 14 Aug 2016 12:12:40 +0800
Not to disagree with your broader point, Mark, but I can think of a
counterexample: the Letters section in scientific journals has long
been a place for 'the community' to explore, rebut or amplify earlier
These are conversations about technical information, albeit a very
slow-moving, Precambrian version of the conversations we see on sites
like Stack Overflow.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:20 AM, wrote:
>_ I think there is a broad__ misconception_ about what
> "social media" means. Social media is not defined by its subject
> It is a description of media, not content. Social media are those
> that are conversational in nature. Books and traditional websites
> social. They are one way communications. I publish, you read. But
> like Facebook, Google Plus, Stack Overflow, and Twitter are social
> I publish and you publish back and we create_ a published
>_ This is a genuinely new media form of the Internet age. We had_
>_ conversations before, and we had publications, but the nearest we
>_ published conversations was the occasional publication of
>_ letters. _
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com