TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Ed wrote:
> You could over-analyze. It might be that they've hired one or
>two blow-hards in the past, and have not much to show for it.
"Must operate independently on tight schedules without placing excess
demands on subject matter experts"
It's an unusually specific requirement which, as Ed says, suggests that
they've had a recent bad experience.
A likely interpretation is:
"Doesn't ask SMEs unnecessary questions." This is reasonable and a good
thing.
If it means "Doesn't ask SMEs necessary questions" then this is very
much *not* a good thing.
Stuart
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
