Re: Interesting job description

Subject: Re: Interesting job description
From: Stuart Burnfield <slb -at- westnet -dot- com -dot- au>
To: 'Techwr-l' <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 11:00:18 +0800

Ed wrote:
> You could over-analyze. It might be that they've hired one or
>two blow-hards in the past, and have not much to show for it.

"Must operate independently on tight schedules without placing excess
demands on subject matter experts"

It's an unusually specific requirement which, as Ed says, suggests that they've had a recent bad experience.

A likely interpretation is:
"Doesn't ask SMEs unnecessary questions." This is reasonable and a good thing.

If it means "Doesn't ask SMEs necessary questions" then this is very much *not* a good thing.

Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Previous by Author: Re: It doesn't look good for Tina the Tech Writer ... OK, this makes for a good segue
Next by Author: RE: Recommendations on Screen Recording and Editing Program
Previous by Thread: Re: Interesting job description
Next by Thread: Comp Passes To LavaCon Available

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads