TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
From my head rather than any style guide or other authority: period
suggests duration; interval, the time between events.
Best regards,
Ant
On 04 April 2017 at 00:23 Monique Semp <monique -dot- semp -at- earthlink -dot- net>
wrote:
Hello, WR-L-ers,
I've googled, and found nothing but confusion (or info that's tied
to a particular software's/class's implementation) around when to
use "time period" vs. "time interval" (and just for fun, "time
duration").
Anyone have a quick cheat-sheet sort of thing or an online reference
you can point me to?
The context is describing how to "work with" charts/tables/reports
(which I'm calling "visualizations" - thanks, Robert!), and the user
can change the start and end times, and even the "range" field, of
the times that are shown as the x-axis.
Thanks,
-Monique
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content
strategy and content development | [1]http://techwhirl.com