Re: Best Modern Alternative to CHM?
If the app is client/server, then implement an HTML window in the client. Windows libraries provide all you need to do that so you can integrate HTML display in your app. Then have the server also serve up the content. Yes, it means your developers have to add more to the client, but in the long run it will improve the user experience. And yes... They can implement different types of HTML windows in the client to embed the help more directly into the user experience.
IMO the ONLY reason to consider CHM is if you need a stand-alone delivery of HTML that doesn't use a server of any kind. And I would question that need. But for a modern, client/server app, there's no excuse for using CHM. (Again, my opinion...)
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
- Re: Best Modern Alternative to CHM?, Robert Lauriston
RE: Best Modern Alternative to CHM?: From: Chris Despopoulos
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites