Re: "via" - why often verboten ?

Subject: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 13:25:11 -0700

The task is sharing a custom view. Copying the URL is how you do that.
I agree that if that's the only way to do it there's no reason to say
"via URL."

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca> wrote:
> The specific action is to share the URL. The custom view is merely
> adjectival in this case.
>
> -Tony
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:37 Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> wrote:
>
>> How many different ways are there to share a custom view? If URL is the
>> only way, there's no need to say anything more than "Share a custom view."
>>
>> Gene Kim-Eng
>>
>>
>> On 8/3/2017 12:14 PM, Tony Chung wrote:
>> > Just to be a pest: why not just say "Share a custom view URL"? After all,
>> > that's what it is.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: "via" - why often verboten ?: From: Monique Semp
Re: "via" - why often verboten ?: From: Tony Chung
Re: "via" - why often verboten ?: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: "via" - why often verboten ?: From: Tony Chung

Previous by Author: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
Next by Author: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
Previous by Thread: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
Next by Thread: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads