Re: Dictionary or Grammar app

Subject: Re: Dictionary or Grammar app
From: "Peter Neilson" <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 13:16:17 -0400

On Fri, 04 Aug 2017 12:48:35 -0400, Cardimon, Craig <ccardimon -at- m-s-g -dot- com> wrote:

Not exactly, something that help with spelling and the occasional WHO vs. WHOM problem.

Oh, like the problem I saw recently where someone in the horse industry wrote "hose industry"? Could just as easily have been house industry. Software for that?

Too whom will you be writing? Watt will be their concern?

The language is slipping away from us. I recently discovered that the common error of writing "wear" for "where" is based on a genuine loss of the "hw" phoneme in American speech. Which is witch, when is wen, whether is weather. Expect worse spelling in the future. Nobody will care, not one whit. Or one wit.
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Dictionary or Grammar app: From: Cardimon, Craig
Re: Dictionary or Grammar app: From: Robert Lauriston
RE: Dictionary or Grammar app: From: Cardimon, Craig

Previous by Author: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
Next by Author: Re: active vs. passive
Previous by Thread: RE: Dictionary or Grammar app
Next by Thread: Re: Dictionary or Grammar app

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads