Re: content structure/strategy

Subject: Re: content structure/strategy
From: "Peter Neilson" <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:43:30 -0500

On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:00:06 -0500, <sharipunyon -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:

Try to focus on the purpose of the software, and the need for a workflow and how it will be used.

Then refocus the documentation on tasks.

Dem guten Herr sei Dank! Someone who has actual advice, not just cynicism.
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


content structure/strategy: From: jopakent
Re: content structure/strategy: From: sharipunyon

Previous by Author: Re: content structure/strategy
Next by Author: Re: Using "Fences" as File Management Tool?
Previous by Thread: Re: content structure/strategy
Next by Thread: Re: content structure/strategy

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads