Re: "layouting," ugh.

Subject: Re: "layouting," ugh.
From: "Peter Neilson" <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 12:28:28 -0400

Quite. Useful expressions or words are sometimes lost through ignorance. Our logical minds grate at hearing that a contradictory statement is true because the exception proves the rule. And which of us doesn't wish to tear apart the speaker who says "begs the question" instead of "raises the question"?

On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 12:11:44 -0400, <Brian -dot- Henderson -at- mitchell1 -dot- com> wrote:

I'm not one of those people who has a problem with language evolving. I mostly revel in it. But a large part of the evolution is due to ignorance and mistakes in hearing. I don't think there's anything wrong with trying trim some of the branches that develop that way.

-Brian H.
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Re: "layouting," ugh.: From: Lauren
Re: "layouting," ugh.: From: Robert Lauriston
RE: "layouting," ugh.: From: Brian.Henderson

Previous by Author: Re: "layouting," ugh.
Next by Author: Re: tech doc - training cooperation
Previous by Thread: Re: "layouting," ugh.
Next by Thread: Re: "layouting," ugh.

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads