TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Left/right adds value to no one except those users who print
double-sided and bind the pages. I've heard that's still common in
I publish to online help, PDF, a help-center format for the web site,
and Zendesk. The main advantage of PDF in the modern era is that it
gives you everything in a single downloadable file.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:13 AM, Rick Quatro <rick -at- rickquatro -dot- com> wrote:
> Who does it look old-fashioned or weird to? This is an opinion that is not
> shared by everyone. "Unless a lot of users are going to print..." So you
> essentially admit that left/right layouts add value for some of the users.
> Do you know what percentage of your users might print and bind pages? Even
> if it is a small number, do you make your documentation less useful so it
> doesn't look "old fashioned or weird"? And, if you are still using a
> page-based format like PDF, you haven't dumped all holdovers from the print
> Eschewing "bookthink" or dumping the "print era" sound more like
> philosophical or fashion statements. I would be more concerned with
> presentation and usability than not wanting to appear old fashioned.
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com