TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Maria Townsley <maria -at- MSD -dot- MEASUREX -dot- COM> writes:
> I just received some information from InterLeaf. Sounds like a
> pretty complete documentation package. Does anyone use all or part
> of it?
I don't use Interleaf. We've got both Interleaf 5.whatever and FrameMaker 3.1X
I don't mean to burst anyone's bubble about Interleaf (nor sour a sale), but I
can't see or hear "Interleaf" without cringing; allow me to elaborate...
I'm pretty handy with computers; not a C. scientist per se, but I'm a guy who's
just got an intuition about the way they work. They make sense. Mostly.
Interleaf is not a package that takes advantage of this intuition, at least
not for me. (By the way, when you run it under Unix/Xwindows for the
first time, it creates a lot of little directories within directories within...
a real pain in the --- to remove)
You run Interleaf and get a cutsie little desktop. Fine. Then you've got to
figure out what the little icons are for... A magical sequense of well placed
button presses will eventually yield a menu with WORDS on it...
What I'm getting at is this: they've used a lot of fancy X-Windows stuff,
but *should* they have used it? I think Interleaf takes longer to learn and
gives a lot fewer cues to the user than your standard "menu driven"
software... Interleaf is not for me.
FrameMaker, however, is my choice. I *love* FrameMaker (ATTENTION Technical
Writers--there is a *shortage* of good step-by-step FrameMaker documentation;
despite this, I still like Frame).
FrameMaker isn't anything like word processing, like some software. Nor is
it super-strict desktop publishing (am I correct in understanding that one
was not able to type in old desktop packages?)
FrameMaker is easy to use; find someone to demo it. FrameMaker also allows you
to author hypertext (the same hypertext that's used for the on-line help,
which you can actually unlock and modify/print).
FrameMaker has cross-platform support. I can simply copy a Unix FM file
off onto a disk, take it to my PC, startup FrameMaker for MS-Windows, and
load it--no conversion neccissary. (I understand that the Mac version of
Frame isn't so hot--there's a special option in the save dialog box for
"interchange format" which looks something like postscript...).
The MS-Windows version operates nearly the same, so there's no retraining
necissary if you buy a version for home...
I could go on for hours about Frame...
Don't buy Interleaf without seeing a good Frame demo first. Inquiries
might go to: comments -at- frame -dot- com
Student STC VP