Re: FrameMaker

Subject: Re: FrameMaker
From: r frey <context -at- DIALIX -dot- OZ -dot- AU>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1993 09:59:27 +0800

In <TECHWR-L%93070816281150 -at- VM1 -dot- UCC -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU> Michele Berkes 615-576-2352
<BERKESM -at- a1 -dot- osti -dot- gov> writes:

Would anyone care to recap the pros and cons of FrameMaker vs. other packages?
>(I don't recall the other names.) Would anyone care to comment on a
>preferred/recommended platform or other hardware issues? Or, if you'd like,
>point me to a good review article of these software packages and related
>issues.

>Please respond to me directly so that we don't waste bandwidth with repeated
>information. Thanks for your patience and insight.

I don't think a good recap would ever be wasted - not on me, anyway :-)

--
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
r frey phone +61 9 246 2916
context -at- dialix -dot- oz -dot- au fax +61 9 246 3449


Previous by Author: Re: Article index for Tech. Communication
Next by Author: Re: STC'S Electronic Bulletin Board
Previous by Thread: FrameMaker
Next by Thread: Re: Framemaker


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads