TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: netettique, included text From:LaVonna Funkhouser <lffunkhouser -at- HALNET -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 3 Nov 1993 08:25:34 -0600
Reference: Steven Owens's comments about including text.
I feel I have to defend myself.
Yes, including all of a previous posting can be annoying,
especially if it is long. However, you should note that for
those of us with less-than-adequate mail interfaces, replying
is an all-or-nothing situation.
I have seen ELM, and it is sweet. I only have Pathworks Mail
and vi available to me, and they are not. Because I find vi
confusing, I use the other, but because I cannot block and
edit text, I either include *all* of the previous post, or
none of the previous posting (as I have done here).
Recently, however, when I included none of a post to which I
had referred, another subscriber asked for clarification.
That is why I chose to break Steven's pet peeve and include
all of the previous post.
Here's another netettique pet peeve of mine: power typing