TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Getting that degree From:Len Olszewski <saslpo -at- UNX -dot- SAS -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 30 Nov 1993 14:26:11 -0500
Jim Gifford enters the discussion about degrees:
> Is the impication that students should not be asked to take any sort
> of general degree requirements? That all you should take at college
> are those courses that relate to your major or those that "interest"
I have mixed feelings in this discussion. I believe very strongly that a
varied college education makes you a more well-rounded individual, and
that you never lose what you learn, even if you never use it directly.
College should teach you *how* to learn. And, it should, for maybe the
only time in many people's lives, provide a safe haven to explore new
OTOH, many folks know *how* to learn, but never get the degree. They are
better prospective employees in any number of fields, in many respects,
than a lot of the folks who did stick it out and get the sheepskin, but
never really learned the importance of initiative, independent thought,
risk-taking, and plain old hard work.
Somebody raised the point that employers use the lack of a degree as a
crude measuring stick to eliminate large numbers of prospective
employees. That hardly seems right, but how else should they do it?
Standardized testing? *Certification*? <-------(Hot button word alert)
In some industries, degreed individuals cannot find *any* work, and
accept positions far beneath their education. They are underemployed,
underutilized, and stuck. They played by the rules, and are now holding
the bag - or the sheepskin, to unabashedly mix metaphors. Is *that*
I've always underemphasized my own academic background, believing firmly
that my ability and my brains are my credentials. I was never naive
enough to think these would get me as far as they would in combination
with my academic background. I'd never have been able to work as a
technical writer without my certificate, and even if I could, I know the
coursework made me a better technical writer. I *could* have learned all
of that from books and observation on my own; *would* I have done so?
No, I don't think the implication is that people should stop getting
college degrees. However, there are inequities...nothing new about that.
I remember when I "temped" after I quit my last job and before I went
back to school. I agree that mismanagement and short-sighted planning
(or a complete lack of planning) characterize a wide-variety of public
and private enterprises in the US of A. No, it's not pretty. No, I don't
have any easy solutions, just observations. (No, I'm not going to squeal
on anybody. 8-)
> to NEW interests, become passe (how does one use an accent in this
> limited form of character based transmission?)?
All caps works well, just as you've done. *I* like to delimit words I'm
emphasizing with adjacent *asterisks*. See?
|Len Olszewski, Technical Writer |"It is not enough to succeed. Others|
|saslpo -at- unx -dot- sas -dot- com|Cary, NC, USA| must fail." - Gore Vidal |
| Opinions this ludicrous are mine. Reasonable opinions will cost you.|