TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Hyper/Multi media From:Simon North <north -at- RUNNER -dot- KNOWARE -dot- NL> Date:Tue, 18 Jan 1994 20:59:46 +0000
Maybe it's time we tightened up our terminology... I make so-called
"interactive electronic technical manuals" (a DoD term). These documents
are essentially hypertext but, for prototype purposes, we are including
sound and real-time video. This is not multimedia, this is 'hypermedia'
since the interface is still predominantly text (document) based. Multi-
media is a term I prefer to reserve for CD-I and its' ilk (what I saw
referred to as TV-ROM once to distinguish it from CD-ROM).
I would however like to breathe some life into the discussion. I am
responsible for leading a so-called 'document technology support' group
within my company (defense manufacturer). I am faced with having to
formulate our strategy concerning document technology until th end of the
decade and beyond. We are already doing hypermedia, CD-ROM distribution
and introducing SGML. I intend to drag the company towards text object
databases and publish-on-demand systems (some major cultural changes will
be needed) but I would be interested to know what the 'group' thinks will
be the key technologies/advances that we should address over the next
15 years (that's about the lifetime of one of our products).