Re: homophones

Subject: Re: homophones
From: "Nancy S. Burns" <nburns -at- NOAO -dot- EDU>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 1994 14:08:00 -0825

>How about "for all intensive purposes" rather than "intents and purposes".


This was the feature gripe in William Saffire's editorial (which appeared
in the "Arizona Star" yesterday). Did you read his column?

Nancy S. Burns
National Solar Observatory
Tucson, Arizona
e-mail: nburns -at- noao -dot- edu

"Vision is the art of seeing things invisible."
- Jonathan Swift

Previous by Author: Re: STC Membership
Next by Author: What is quality?
Previous by Thread: Re: homophones
Next by Thread: Re: homophones

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads