Re: homophones

Subject: Re: homophones
From: "Nancy S. Burns" <nburns -at- NOAO -dot- EDU>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 1994 14:08:00 -0825

>How about "for all intensive purposes" rather than "intents and purposes".
>GRRR

>Bonni


This was the feature gripe in William Saffire's editorial (which appeared
in the "Arizona Star" yesterday). Did you read his column?

Nancy S. Burns
National Solar Observatory
Tucson, Arizona
e-mail: nburns -at- noao -dot- edu

"Vision is the art of seeing things invisible."
- Jonathan Swift


Previous by Author: Re: STC Membership
Next by Author: What is quality?
Previous by Thread: Re: homophones
Next by Thread: Re: homophones


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads