Re[2]: homophones

Subject: Re[2]: homophones
From: Bonni Graham <Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD -at- RELAY -dot- PROTEON -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 1994 09:20:00 EST

Nancy notes:
"This [intensive purposes] was the feature gripe in William Saffire's
editorial (which appeared in the "Arizona Star" yesterday). Did you read
his column?

No, I missed that -- wish I hadn't. Maybe the best thing would just be to
switch it to "in tents and porpoises"?


Previous by Author: Re: homophones
Next by Author: Re[4]: homophones
Previous by Thread: Re: Re[2]: homophones
Next by Thread: Re[4]: homophones

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads