TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: A reply to a previous discussion From:Don M Chaffee <dchaffee -at- WORLD -dot- STD -dot- COM> Date:Sun, 30 Jan 1994 20:08:21 GMT
Dave Christensen <dave -at- upl -dot- com> writes:
>I am posting this for someone else. Please feel free to Email any
>response to me for relaying to the other party.
>A comment on the recent David A. Lowe-Don M. Chaffee exchange.
>>Info Mapping is largely horsefeathers, so be critical. Common sense in
>I think Don is correct when he says Info Mapping is mostly horsefeathers
>-- but not all. Let me rewrite what I believe Don is trying to say:
>The structure of the Information Maping "system" is horsefeathers.
>Don't dismiss it outright, however. Information Mapping was an attempt
>at rewriting old, common sense presentation formats for sciences --
>flowcharting, spacial relationships, recipes, procedures, etc. In trying
>to turn IM into a science, IM authors gave it big time bog down.
>I didn't catch onto the seriousness of the bog down until I tried to
>teach IM to our department writers. I wanted to rewrite the lessons
>after the first "map" -- but that would have been developing a whole
>Maybe IM is a theory; theories don't usually make sense until simplified
>by their pupils. The best way to use the good old theories behind IM
>then, is to sublimate the theory -- know it -- then, apply it through
>simpler and simpler methods.
>OEC Medical Systems, Inc.
>(186 min left), (H)elp, More? Salt Lake City, Utah
>---- Not in the net yet, but soon.
>Make any replies readable by all
>and they will get to me. - JV
Janice: Thanks for the additional input. I took a little heat from some
of my neighbors here in Wellesley who work for IM, which is just a few
miles up Rt.128.