Abort, Retry, Fail...

Subject: Abort, Retry, Fail...
From: Anatole Wilson <awilson -at- VNET -dot- IBM -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 1994 12:32:58 PDT

I think OS/2 has come a long way in abolishing the Abort/Retry/Fail
problem--at least as far as terrifying or confusing the user. (My
problem has always been that abort and fail seemed synonymous to me.)

For example, if I try to access the A: drive when there's no disk in it,
I get the following message:

SYSTEM ERROR
SYS0039
The A: Device is not ready.

Options
o Return error code to program
o End program/command/operation
o Retry command or operation


So the message told me what the problem was (generally) and reworded
the Abort/Retry/Fail options in a way that better explained what would
happen when I chose that option (though at first glance I wouldn't have a
clue what good sending a "return error code to program" would do me).

At least with this message I don't get that sinking feeling in the pit of
my stomach that no matter what I do next, I've destroyed my system.

Heck--until this discussion, I didn't even realize that this *was* the
abort/retry/fail message.

================================
Anatole Wilson "We are all interested in the
Sr. Assoc. Information Developer future, for that is where you
IBM, Santa Teresa Labs and I will spend the rest of
awilson -at- vnet -dot- ibm -dot- com our lives."
all company disclaimers apply --Griswell
================================


Previous by Author: SGML
Next by Author: SGML Forum in New York
Previous by Thread: More Ridiculousness
Next by Thread: Looking for a school


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads