TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: So who is truly tougher? From:mpriestley -at- VNET -dot- IBM -dot- COM Date:Thu, 14 Jul 1994 10:31:03 EDT
>> I see your ideas leading directly to mind control, the devaluation of
>> the individual, and the erosion of rights and freedoms. And so, instead of
>> shrugging it off, I write through my lunch break to express my disagreement.
and Don Reese replied:
>When did gentle reproach become mind control? Miss Manners is a fascist,
I should have made clearer which of Heli's ideas I objected to. Or rather,
since I probably made that overabundantly clear, I should have made clear
which of her ideas I _do_ agree.
I _do_ think a gentle reproach is the most appropriate response.
I _do_ think verbal violence and physical violence have a common denomenator,
in the victim's sense of hurt.
However, I don't think verbal violence is equivalent to physical violence,
and I don't think that thinking thoughts or saying words is tantamount
to beating a wife or child. I agree that verbal violence can be extremely
damaging, as part of an ongoing campaign of total emotional abuse within
a domestic situation. I think getting "flamed" by a stranger, in text only,
in a forum that actively promotes free thinking and expression, is not
the same thing at all.
I probably overreacted. A key phrase hit a button: "Violence is violence.
Think the thought, speak the word, and you will eventually do the deed."
By this law, Stephen King is well on his way to being a mass murderer.
The comparison seems far-fetched? I once, in university,
wrote a piece that deviated from bland political-correctness: it took the
viewpoint of a murderer with multiple personality disorder. It was a
disturbing piece, not overtly violent, but creepy. It was meant to be.
I received even more disturbing reactions: it was a "bad sign" that I could
write a story like that. It got published anyway. If more people had had
the "bad sign" mentality, it wouldn't have. I hold that meagre publishing
success dear to my heart. When someone says something that threatens
my right to write anything I want, my hackles rise.
I consider verbal abuse to be a form of violence. I consider censorship
to be a much greater form of violence, and much more dangerous.
Miss Manners, by the way, is entirely appropriate to social situations,
like parties. But I think there is a point at which politeness hinders
communication. And when politeness says: "if you've got nothing nice
to say, say nothing at all" - well, that's appropriate to the tea party,
but I don't think it's appropriate to the internet.
mpriestley -at- vnet -dot- ibm -dot- com
Disclaimer: I'm pretty obviously speaking on my own behalf, eh?