TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: So who is truly tougher? From:Don Reese <wedge -at- UNM -dot- EDU> Date:Thu, 14 Jul 1994 16:47:39 -0600
On Thu, 14 Jul 1994 mpriestley -at- VNET -dot- IBM -dot- COM wrote:
> I wrote:
> >> I see your ideas leading directly to mind control, the devaluation of
> >> the individual, and the erosion of rights and freedoms. And so, instead of
> >> shrugging it off, I write through my lunch break to express my
> and Don Reese replied:
> >When did gentle reproach become mind control? Miss Manners is a fascist,
> >I guess...
> However, I don't think verbal violence is equivalent to physical violence,
> and I don't think that thinking thoughts or saying words is tantamount
> to beating a wife or child. I agree that verbal violence can be extremely
> damaging, as part of an ongoing campaign of total emotional abuse within
> a domestic situation. I think getting "flamed" by a stranger, in text only,
> in a forum that actively promotes free thinking and expression, is not
> the same thing at all.
No argument here.
> I probably overreacted. A key phrase hit a button: "Violence is violence.
> Think the thought, speak the word, and you will eventually do the deed."
> By this law, Stephen King is well on his way to being a mass murderer.
> The comparison seems far-fetched?
Or at the least, an exaggeration; as you've said, there is a comparison
to be made, but I agree that the thought and the deed are most
emphatically not the beginning and end of some slippery slope of immorality.
But your own comparison--protesting verbal cruelty is a form of
censorship--is likewise an exaggeration, which was the point of my post.
In my zest to be pithy, I'm afraid I left a lot out.
> I hold that meagre publishing
> success dear to my heart.
As well you should. They're so few and far between, aren't they?
By the by, speaking of Miss Manners: is this conversation appropriate, or
is it taking up valuable shoptalk time? This is a serious question (more
or less), not an attempt to antagonize.
Don Reese__________ wedge -at- unm -dot- edu__________ University of New Mexico