TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
On Fri, 15 Jul 1994, Vollbach, Elizabeth wrote:
> Yes, Caryn, it certainly would be ideal if we all tried to adhere to
> the same writing standards. The reason technical writers and editors
> exist is simply because they can relay information so it is readable
> and usable. And how much more readable and usable would that
> information be if only writing standards were more standardized and
> less whatever-you-want-ish! That's exactly my point in my "Ms.
> Thistlebottom" column in our STC newsletter. And that's why I call
> her "Ms." rather than Berstein's "Miss." Beth
Universal Standards, yes, but only in America. For example, "Ms." isn't
standard. One of our secretaries thinks that it is the abbreviation for
Miss and refuses to use it.
Furthermore, Ms. is only in America. Germans or Danes wouldn't know what
it means. How about the Brits on this list here? What does Ms. mean to you?