TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:To Vet or Not to Vet From:"Segal, Betty S." <bss3 -at- PHPMTS1 -dot- EM -dot- CDC -dot- GOV> Date:Sun, 18 Sep 1994 15:09:00 EST
Re: use of the word 'vet' in the context of checking and proofreading:
I have seen the word used in this sense only in British writings. Apparently
the usage evolved from _veterinarian_ in the following sequence:
veterinarian = vet = take to a veterinarian for examination = examine
carefully. Both the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary and the 3rd edition of
The American Heritage Dictionary show this usage for 'vet.' The AHD says:
"2. To subject to thorough examination or evaluation: _vet a manuscript._"
Betty Segal (BSS3 -at- phpmts1 -dot- em -dot- cdc -dot- gov)
Sr. Training Development Specialist (Instructional Editor)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention