TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: why manuals? From:mpriestley -at- VNET -dot- IBM -dot- COM Date:Sat, 24 Sep 1994 16:22:32 EDT
Chuck Martin writes:
>Will online information replace print? I like the way William Horton
>put it in his book _Designing and Writing Online Information_:
> "Online documents have not replaced paper documents and probably will
> not until we have online documents as efficient as this one:
> "High-density, lap-top information display device. Nonvolatile memory
> with zero power consumption. Able to display text and graphics at
> 1250 dots per inch resolution in monochrome or up to 32,000 colors on
> a 100 mega-pixel display. Features simple, intuitive, direct-
> manipulation user-interface with both sequential and random access
> mechanisms. Functional at temperatures from -120 to +451 degrees F."
I have heard this quote before, and I believe William Horton overstates
the case. Of course online will never match these criteria. The question is
which of these characteristics are truly important, and how close a match
has to be, to be good enough. I, personally, don't know anyone who reads
books at +450 degrees F. At that temperature, you've got other things to
worry about besides plot development.
Try this on for a paraphrase:
"Paper documents have not replaced stone tablets and probably will not until
we have paper documents as efficient as this one:
"Durable, all-weather interface, legible at any temperature short of lava.
No power consumption, no infrastucture necessary to produce or display
information. Capable of three-dimensional displays up to half an inch in
depth. Completely intuitive interface, impossible to steal from a library,
can be read under water, in the dark with your fingers, will outlast your
Yeah, but I just want to read a _book_...
Electronic documents cannot provide every feature of a printed book. But I
think they provide enough of the features, and enough additional features,
to make their prevalence and and cultural dominance inevitable. A car, after
all, is not a horse; and yet engine-driven transportation has quite definitely
replaced horse-powered transportation as the dominant mode, world-wide.
mpriestley -at- vnet -dot- ibm -dot- com
Disclaimer: speaking on my own behalf, not IBM's