TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: online vs. paper From:Karen Kay <karenk -at- NETCOM -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 6 Oct 1994 23:13:31 -0700
mpriestley -at- VNET -dot- IBM -dot- COM said:
> I don't think this has much to do with resolution. I've never noticed
> any fatigue in myself when reading dot matrix, for example.
Whooo, boy... I'd much rather read on a screen than read 9-pin
dot-matrix. No contest.
> >Also, readers' attention spans are shorter when reading static displays.
> I'm not sure what you mean by a static display. Isn't a book a static
No, you can move it around.
> If they're reading the pages sequentially (say the very first time they open
> the user's guide), then online does indeed require them to "turn the page"
> perhaps two-three times more often. Personally that doesn't bother me, though
> I understand how it could bother some people.
It bugs me a lot. I feel like I'm spending all my time flipping
instead of getting information.
> Consider point sizes in a
> book: are you really frustrated by books with a larger point size?
It depends on the point size. I had to read a book for a group I
belong to, the Black Mambas Murder and Gossip Club, and it was only
available in a large-print edition in my library. It was great because
I didn't need my reading glasses....but frustrating because I was
always turning pages.