TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>"ease of use." Because the resolution of information displayed on a
>computer screen is, at best, a small fraction of the resolution of 10,000
>dots per sq. mm. for information in a typeset document, fatigue sets in
>more quickly when reading online documentation.
I don't think this has much to do with resolution. I've never noticed
any fatigue in myself when reading dot matrix, for example. There have
been testimonials on alt.hypertext (responding to a similar thread) of
people having read full-length novels (mostly on small portables with
LCD screens, which they claimed were more readable). I think the fatigue
has much more to do with the limited number of postures available when your
reading material is in a fixed position (try reading from a lectern for an
hour or three).
Ah, but studies show that screens do indeed cause fatigue--particularly
interlaced screens, where the pixels must be drawn twice to acheive full
resolution. That's why you pay the big bucks for "non-interlaced" screens.
LCD doesn't have that problem, of course.
Doesn't anyone else here get fatigued while reading a book, though? The
contrast of black on white is known to cause eye-strain, and I fall asleep
or get restless sometimes....depends on the book, of course!
Gwen (ggall -at- ca -dot- oracle -dot- com)
"The question is not the size of your intelligence,
but how you use the little amount of it you might have."