Dead magazines

Subject: Dead magazines
From: Aahz <aahz -at- NETCOM -dot- COM>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 1994 00:15:02 GMT

In article <199410071539 -dot- AA03581 -at- interlock -dot- jci -dot- com>,
<Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- jci -dot- com> wrote:

> [ . . . ] the old Computer Language magazine (moment of
>silence observed with hand over heart for the passing of the best computer mag
>in the business) [ . . . ]


(What really croggles me are the people who think that Dr. Frob's makes
an acceptable substitute.)

Context for those who care:
Computer Language made a business of covering the programming
*profession*; despite the name, CL had more generic information than
any other computer magazine I've ever seen.

ObTechWriting: Damn, I miss professional programmers who write as well
as P.J. Plauger.
--- Aahz (

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
Androgynous kinky vanilla queer het

The best way to get information on Usenet is not to ask a question,
but to post the wrong information.

Previous by Author: Re: What RTFM stands for
Next by Author: Experts/Wizards/Whatevers (was Deathly Exaggerations)
Previous by Thread: Online vs. Printed: Is there a BETTER way?
Next by Thread: Experts/Wizards/Whatevers (was Deathly Exaggerations)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads