TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Sie/hir From:Laurie Rubin <lmr -at- SYL -dot- NJ -dot- NEC -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 21 Nov 1994 10:35:00 -0500
Does anyone remember the "universal language" idea that was being tossed around
as becoming the "international language"? I think there was talk about it in
the 1970s. The language even had a somewhat complicated name that has alluded
me. Well, I don't think that language got off the preliminary think tank
I can't see how something like "sie/hir" could, either! If we assume these
names are used only for English text, I agree with Anatole that they don't
change the bipolar use of his/her, he/she sexist thing. That is why I always
try to use "the user" (for any user: male, female, monkey, alien, etc.) or
"you" in my docs.
> I have to say I don't understand "sie/hir." How is it supposed to be used,
> and if the terms are supposed to mask gender, why are there two terms instead
> of just one? Seems to me you could easily suppose that "sie" means "his" and
> "hir" means "her."
> Anatole Wilson "We are all interested in the
> Sr. Assoc. Information Developer future, for that is where
> IBM, Santa Teresa Labs you and I will spend
> awilson -at- vnet -dot- ibm -dot- com the rest of our lives."
> all company disclaimers apply - Criswell, Plan 9 From Outer Space