TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: PC Comments From:Karen Kay <karenk -at- NETCOM -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 22 Nov 1994 22:10:55 -0800
David Blyth @second said:
> I find "chairperson" to be less ambiguous than "chair". Academic
> environments already use "chair" to denote 2 different types of position
> - the "chair" of a department and an endowed "chair". If "chair" is
> used in lieu of "chairperson", then yet another definition is added.
I used to teach at a state university with no endowed chairs. There
were division heads, but no chairs. Only committees had chairs. I
just find it simpler to use one word.
In these 3 instances of dept. heads, endowed chairs, and committee
chairs, the word 'chair' is usually preceded by some explicatory
modifier. I would expect the default case to be department chair, if
you're at a university that has has them.
I remember discussing this very issue with a dept. chair close to 20
years ago. At that time, 'chair' was less common than 'chairman', and
she insisted on being called 'chairman' to go along with other depts.
It taught me a lesson about sexist language.