TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Word use: Express/ed From:"Sandy, Corinne" <CHS8 -at- CPSOD1 -dot- EM -dot- CDC -dot- GOV> Date:Thu, 8 Dec 1994 10:46:00 EST
Having a law school background, the legal term "express" is the opposite of
"implied." So the author would have to have a statement similar to:
"Authority is given to _____ to copy, distribute or duplicate the work
(express)" vs "In the case of copying, distribution or duplication of the
work, author must give written authority." This may not be the best
example of an implied statement, but it should be read as the author is
thinking about giving authority but has not definitively stated it or there
is a condition upon which the authority may be granted.
To: Multiple recipients of list TECHWR-L
Subject: Word use: Express/ed
Date: Thursday, December 08, 1994 9:25AM
Return-Path: <TECHWR-L -at- VM1 -dot- ucc -dot- okstate -dot- edu>
Received: from msmail.em.cdc.gov by router.em.cdc.gov id
<2EE6A19D -at- router -dot- em -dot- cdc -dot- gov>; Thu, 08 Dec 94 10:03:09 EST
Received: from VM1.ucc.okstate.edu by msmail.em.cdc.gov (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id
AA14524; Thu, 8 Dec 1994 10:03:51 -0500
Message-Id: <9412081503 -dot- AA14524 -at- msmail -dot- em -dot- cdc -dot- gov>
Received: from OSUVM1.BITNET by VM1.ucc.okstate.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with
BSMTP id 8419; Thu, 08 Dec 94 08:57:15 CST
Received: from VM1.UCC.OKSTATE.EDU by OSUVM1.BITNET (Mailer R2.08 R208004)
with BSMTP id 3396; Thu, 08 Dec 94 08:43:54 CST
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 1994 09:25:33 EST
Reply-To: Gwen Gall <ggall -at- CA -dot- ORACLE -dot- COM>
Sender: "Technical Writers List; for all Technical Communication issues"
<TECHWR-L -at- VM1 -dot- ucc -dot- okstate -dot- edu>
From: Gwen Gall <ggall -at- CA -dot- ORACLE -dot- COM>
Subject: Word use: Express/ed
Comments: To: TECHWR-L -at- VM1 -dot- ucc -dot- okstate -dot- edu
To: Multiple recipients of list TECHWR-L <TECHWR-L -at- OSUVM1 -dot- BITNET>
I received a humourous sendup of "How the Grinch Stole Christmas" (about
Gingrich, of course), and noticed a use of the word "express/ed" in a manner
didn't think was correct. However, let the writing list be the judge. Here's
"This work was created solely for the amusement of
the authors and should not be copied, distributed or otherwise
duplicated by any means (electronic or telepathic included) without
the expressed written consent of whoever owns the copyright to the
book the authors plagiarized to create this masterpiece."
My concern is the word "expressed": shouldn't it be "express", in the same
meaning as "I _expressly_ told you not to do that", or as one Oxford
"definitely stated, not merely implied"
I have seen this alot, and wondered if it was just ignorance, of if I had
misinterpreting all these years, and it really was supposed to mean, as in
"he expressed his opinion".