Re: That and Which--is it worth it?

Subject: Re: That and Which--is it worth it?
From: Vicki Rosenzweig <murphy!acmcr!vr -at- UUNET -dot- UU -dot- NET>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 1994 10:54:43 EST

I wouldn't worry that the audience doesn't know the rules--many
people will cheerfully accept either a "to" or an en dash and
not even notice, and that's all right. The more serious question
is what to do when the rules as we understand them don't match
what a lot of people think is appropriate.

Barb, your mention of the evolution of the language is as good
a hook as any to hang my fairly strong suspicion that Fowler was
not summing up a grammatical rule that already existed, but trying--with
a fair degree of success--to introduce one, in his distinction
between "that" and "which." The passage from _Modern English Usage_
says that "if careful writers follow this" (I may not have it
exactly right, but that's the sense of it), the language will be
improved--it does not say that either English idiom or careful
writers have made this distinction in the past. I'm inclined to
think that, after decades of trying, we should admit that this one
isn't going to catch on and stop worrying about it. (I make it
myself, but that doesn't mean other people are wrong for not

Vicki Rosenzweig
vr%acmcr -dot- uucp -at- murphy -dot- com
New York, NY

Previous by Author: Re: I18N & L10N
Next by Author: Re: backformation
Previous by Thread: Re: That and Which--is it worth it?
Next by Thread: Re: That and Which--is it worth it?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads