TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>However, everyone probably has a different notion of what
>"technically correct" means. I have no problems
>truncating the number pi to 3.1415
This is a good example of the difference between precision and accuracy.
It's accurate to say that pi equals 3.14.
It's more precise but inaccurate to say that pi equals 3.1415. The correct
approximation of pi to four decimal places is 3.1416, since pi equals 3.14159...
You would have to struggle to find a case in which saying pi equals 3.1415
is clearer than saying pi equals 3.1416. Yet it might be clearer, more
readable, and perfectly appropriate to say that pi equals 3.14.
We need to choose a level of precision appropriate to what we're trying to
say. I don't think we have a choice about accuracy. ...RM
Richard Mateosian Technical Writer in Berkeley CA srm -at- c2 -dot- org