Re[2]: moderate techwr-l?

Subject: Re[2]: moderate techwr-l?
From: "Arlen P. Walker" <Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- JCI -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 1995 18:01:00 -0500

Kinda sounds like cencorship to me. Bad idea... Bad... Bad...

Doesn't strike you as just a teensy ironic that "censorship" is automatically
dismissed as bad on the same list that takes it for granted that programmers and
engineers shouldn't have *their* words published verbatim?

Not an intent to start a discussion, just appreciating the irony. ;{>}


Have fun,
Arlen
Chief Managing Director In Charge, Department of Redundancy Department
DNRC 24

Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- JCI -dot- Com
----------------------------------------------
In God we trust; all others must provide data.
----------------------------------------------


Previous by Author: Re[2]: Dealing with engineers' input
Next by Author: Re[2]: Wordsmithing
Previous by Thread: Re: moderate techwr-l?
Next by Thread: Re: Re[2]: moderate techwr-l?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads