Re: Re[2]: moderate techwr-l?

Subject: Re: Re[2]: moderate techwr-l?
From: Jan Boomsliter <boom -at- CADENCE -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 1995 08:40:23 -0800

Too bad; discussion started anyway:

Are you comparing rewriting and editing with censorship?

You can't have meant that. Boggles the mind.


jb
================================
Kinda sounds like cencorship to me. Bad idea... Bad... Bad...

Doesn't strike you as just a teensy ironic that "censorship" is automatically
dismissed as bad on the same list that takes it for granted that programmers an

engineers shouldn't have *their* words published verbatim?

Not an intent to start a discussion, just appreciating the irony. ;{>}


Have fun,
Arlen
Chief Managing Director In Charge, Department of Redundancy Department
DNRC 24

Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- JCI -dot- Com
----------------------------------------------
In God we trust; all others must provide data.
----------------------------------------------


Previous by Author: standard references
Next by Author: Re: SGML Temp. Job (RTP, NC)
Previous by Thread: Re: moderate techwr-l?
Next by Thread: Re: Moderate techwr-l?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads