Re: Re[2]: moderate techwr-l?

Subject: Re: Re[2]: moderate techwr-l?
From: Jan Boomsliter <boom -at- CADENCE -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 1995 08:40:23 -0800

Too bad; discussion started anyway:

Are you comparing rewriting and editing with censorship?

You can't have meant that. Boggles the mind.

Kinda sounds like cencorship to me. Bad idea... Bad... Bad...

Doesn't strike you as just a teensy ironic that "censorship" is automatically
dismissed as bad on the same list that takes it for granted that programmers an

engineers shouldn't have *their* words published verbatim?

Not an intent to start a discussion, just appreciating the irony. ;{>}

Have fun,
Chief Managing Director In Charge, Department of Redundancy Department

Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- JCI -dot- Com
In God we trust; all others must provide data.

Previous by Author: standard references
Next by Author: Re: SGML Temp. Job (RTP, NC)
Previous by Thread: Re: moderate techwr-l?
Next by Thread: Re: Moderate techwr-l?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads