Re: TOC for Two Volumes

Subject: Re: TOC for Two Volumes
From: Mark Levinson <mark -at- SD -dot- CO -dot- IL>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 1995 10:43:21 IST

My personal preference is to have a table of contents in each
volume. ( - Bill Burns, to Kelly)

** I missed the question to which that was an answer, but I'll
add another alternative. One could (as I recently did) cover
the whole two-volume set in the TOC of each volume, but with
each TOC listing its own volume thoroughly and the other
volume in less detail.
Mark L. Levinson | E-mail: mark -at- sd -dot- co -dot- il
Summit Design (EDA) Ltd. | Voice: +972-9-507102, ext. 230 (work),
Box 544 | +972-9-552411 (home)
46105 Herzlia, ISRAEL | Fax: +972-9-509118
"Graphics are especially useful for drawing readers into the book."
- STC Intercom

Previous by Author: FrameMaker docs version control
Next by Author: "An" before "h"
Previous by Thread: Re: TOC for Two Volumes
Next by Thread: Re: TOC for Two Volumes

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads