TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Articles with Acronyms From:Jan Boomsliter <boom -at- CADENCE -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 11 Jan 1995 10:28:48 -0800
Wait a dadburn minute! Let's see if I've got this right:
The use of the article depends on assumed common usage, rather than
what the reader is looking at right there on the paper?
Then we'd have to know exactly what is in each reader's head and each
moment. (Slow down, everybody who wants to point out that that is part
of what we do. I said "exactly.") An awesome task.
Until and unless "scuzzy" becomes the acronym, all you've got is an
abbreviation beginning with the letter "s." If you want "scuzzy," say
"a scuzzy." If you want SCSI, say "an SCSI."
Nitpickers Association of the World
Kelly Burhenne asks:
> Text item: Text_1
> Question: When using an acronym (as you all know, very prevalent in our
> profession) preceded by an article, should you use the article that
> agrees with the first word the acronym represents, or use the article
> that agrees with the pronunciation of the acronym.
> e.g.: an FTP
> a FTP
> a SS2000 (SiteScan 2000)
> or an SS2000
What I've always heard & used is "Use the article the way you'd say it"
so that it subvocalizes correctly. FTP can't be pronounced, you say the
letters, so use "an FTP" -- SCSI, OTOH, is pronounced scuzzy and you'd
say "a scuzzy drive".
StarBase Corp, Irvine CA
sgallagher -at- starbasecorp -dot- com