Re: Articles with Acronyms

Subject: Re: Articles with Acronyms
From: "Sandy, Corinne" <CHS8 -at- CPSOD1 -dot- EM -dot- CDC -dot- GOV>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 1995 09:12:00 EST

Something caught my eye during this discussion. I read in some style guide
a long time ago that "an" before a word beginning with "h" is not
incorrect. An "a" should be used. The rationale is because,
historically, h's were not pronounced . Instead of pronouncing "history"
it used to be pronounced 'istory. And because of this, "an" was used.
Now-a-days in English, it is pronounced history, so an is supposedly
obsolete. Consequently, I write and say "a" before "h." The funny thing
is, though, that I was tempted to write "an" when writing this e-mail
anytime I was going to write "h." So, now I'm not sure. What do you
think?

Corinne
----------
From: TECHWR-L
To: Multiple recipients of list TECHWR-L
Subject: Re: Articles with Acronyms
Date: Tuesday, January 10, 1995 11:33AM

Return-Path: <TECHWR-L -at- VM1 -dot- ucc -dot- okstate -dot- edu>
Received: from msmail by SmtpIn.em.cdc.gov id <2F1259AB -at- SmtpIn -dot- em -dot- cdc -dot- gov>;
Tue, 10 Jan 95 13:55:55 EST
Received: from VM1.ucc.okstate.edu by msmail (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA06453; Tue,
10 Jan 1995 13:47:38 -0500
Message-Id: <9501101847 -dot- AA06453 -at- msmail>
Received: from OSUVM1.BITNET by VM1.ucc.okstate.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with
BSMTP id 9896; Tue, 10 Jan 95 12:42:55 CST
Received: from VM1.UCC.OKSTATE.EDU by OSUVM1.BITNET (Mailer R2.08 R208004)
with BSMTP id 1053; Tue, 10 Jan 95 12:11:29 CST
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 11:33:21 -0600
Reply-To: Mercury!tsh!dan -at- MCS -dot- NET
Sender: "Technical Writers List; for all Technical Communication issues"

<TECHWR-L -at- VM1 -dot- ucc -dot- okstate -dot- edu>
From: Dan Glovier <Mercury!tsh!dan -at- MCS -dot- NET>
Subject: Re: Articles with Acronyms
Comments: To: VM1 -dot- ucc -dot- okstate -dot- edu!TECHWR-L -at- kitten -dot- mcs -dot- com
To: Multiple recipients of list TECHWR-L <TECHWR-L -at- OSUVM1 -dot- BITNET>
In-Reply-To: <m0rRjfB-000BqfC -at- mercury -dot- mcs -dot- com>
content-length: 1095
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
The Gods overheard Kelly Burhenne state:

> Question: When using an acronym (as you all know, very prevalent in our
> profession) preceded by an article, should you use the article that
> agrees with the first word the acronym represents, or use the article
> that agrees with the pronunciation of the acronym.

> e.g.: an FTP
> a FTP

> a SS2000 (SiteScan 2000)
> or an SS2000


> Kelly Burhenne
> burhennk -at- smtpgw -dot- liebert -dot- com

Kelly,

Use the article that agrees with the pronunciation of
acronym (i.e. an FTP).

Quoting from my Little, Brown Handbook (pg. 546):

When you use an abbreviation or acronym in writing, the article that
precedes it depends on how the abbreviation is to be read:
She was once an HEW undersecretary. (HEW is to be read as three letters,
not as a word or as Health, Education, and Welfare.) Many Americans
opposed a SALT treaty. (SALT is to be read as one word, salt, not as
four separate leatters.)



--
Dan Glovier
dan -at- tsh -dot- com

"A million years of evolution, we get Danny Quayle."
- "Insanity" Boingo


Previous by Author: Re: Boat versus Cassette
Next by Author: Re: in or on
Previous by Thread: Re: Articles with Acronyms
Next by Thread: Re: Articles with Acronyms


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads