TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Frame vs. Word From:Beverly Parks <bparks -at- HUACHUCA-EMH1 -dot- ARMY -dot- MIL> Date:Fri, 13 Jan 1995 12:11:11 MST
Everyone except MONTCALM -at- hou -dot- sperry-sun -dot- com may want to skip
this. I tried to send it directly to that address, but it
----- Forwarded Message Start
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 95 11:39:08 MST
From: huachuca-emh1 Mail System (MMDF) <mmdf -at- huachuca-emh1>
Sender: mmdf -at- huachuca-emh1
Subject: Failed Mail - Unknown Address (msg.aa02861)
To: bparks -at- huachuca-emh1 -dot- army -dot- mil
Your message could not be delivered to
'MONTCALM -at- hou -dot- sperry-sun -dot- com (host: hou.sperry-sun.com) (queue: smtp)' for
the following reason: 'Connection refused by remote host'
Your message begins as follows:
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 95 11:32:38 MST
From: Beverly Parks <bparks -at- huachuca-emh1 -dot- army -dot- mil>
To: MONTCALM -at- hou -dot- sperry-sun -dot- com
Subject: Re: Re: Why Frame not Word?
I am a little confused by your e-mail. You sent it to me (Bev
Parks), but then addressed it to "Mike." So I'm not sure if you
really meant it for me or not.
I personally don't have hands-on experience with Word, but I
have read reviews on it and though it is a *very* strong
word processsing program with some desktop publishing
capabilities, it is simply not in the same class of software as
Interleaf. (I am also not familiar with Frame, but I think it is
more like Interleaf than it is like Word.)
Functionality aside, another primary consideration is cost. We
*already have* Interleaf in-house and running on very expensive
Sun platforms. Where is the rationale for chucking all that for
a product with lesser capability? That money would be better
spent training the work force to get the most out of the
technology they already possess.
=*= Beverly Parks =*= bparks -at- huachuca-emh1 -dot- army -dot- mil =*=
=*= "Unless otherwise stated, all comments are my own. =*=
=*= I am not representing my employer in any way." =*=
> Received: from tech.sperry-sun.com by host.huachuca-emh1.army.mil id aa25921;
13 Jan 95 9:58 MST
> Received: from hou.sperry-sun.com (hou.Sperry-Sun.COM [22.214.171.124]) by
tech.sperry-sun.com (8.6.5/8.3) with SMTP id KAA18987; Fri, 13 Jan 1995
> From: MONTCALM -at- hou -dot- sperry-sun -dot- com
> Received: from cc:Mail by hou.sperry-sun.com
> id AA790023159; Thu, 12 Jan 95 22:56:29 CST
> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 95 22:56:29 CST
> Message-Id: <9500137900 -dot- AA790023159 -at- hou -dot- sperry-sun -dot- com>
> To: Beverly Parks <bparks -at- HUACHUCA-EMH1 -dot- ARMY -dot- MIL>
> Subject: Re: Why Frame not Word?
> What's up with Word? I would like to see your report of Frame vs Word, please.
> am in the same fight except I favor Word. Don't take it personally.
> Maybe it's time for a paradigm shift, y'all.
> Subject: Re: Why Frame not Word?
> From: Beverly Parks <bparks -at- HUACHUCA-EMH1 -dot- ARMY -dot- MIL> at Internet-Mail
> Date: 1/13/95 10:46 AM
>> mikel -at- HUEY -dot- ACCUGRAPH -dot- COM noted:
>>> Upper management in my company is exerting pressure for
>>> the documentation people to jump on the Word bandwagon
>>> and abandon our dearly beloved FrameMaker. I'm now
>>> in the process of drafting a report on the advantages
>>> of Frame and the disadvantages of Word.
> And Ellen Adams responded with some great advice. Thanks, Ellen,
> because I, too, may soon be facing a similar battle where I
> work. We use Interleaf on a Sun network and have had this
> technology for just under two years. Imagine this: we went from
> using MultiMate Advantage II on PCs to Interleaf 5 on Suns. I
> was one of the very few who picked up Interleaf fast (thanks to
> my dabbling in desktop publishing at home). Even though the
> entire workforce received training, they still struggle with it.
> They were trained in using the software, but not in publishing
> vice word processing concepts.
> Oh, here's one to make anybody grit their teeth (or worse). They
> set up the default font as Courier. Of course it is easily changed
> once the document is created, but that's the mentality of the people I
> get to deal with every day. (Not necessarily individual mentality,
> but *Army* mentality).
> Now, we get in a new commander who thinks Microsoft Word (and
> the other MS Office products) is the best thing going and wants
> to replace our lovely Suns and Interleaf with PCs and Microsoft
> Word. This is still in the talk stage, and several people are
> trying to convince him otherwise. However, because the majority
> of the workforce has never really become comfortable with
> Interleaf, I fear for the outcome.
> Thanks for listening, everybody.
> =*= Beverly Parks =*= bparks -at- huachuca-emh1 -dot- army -dot- mil =*=
> =*= "Unless otherwise stated, all comments are my own. =*=
> =*= I am not representing my employer in any way." =*=