Re: Tara Scanlon's "How would you reduce your documentation by 80%?"

Subject: Re: Tara Scanlon's "How would you reduce your documentation by 80%?"
From: Patrick O'Connell <patricko -at- EICON -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 1995 10:21:00 PST

Provided you're talking about software: make the program so intuitive and
well-designed that 80% of the documentation is simply unnecessary.

Yeah, I know. I don't think it'll ever happen, either. If it does, an awful
lot of us may have to become user-interface gurus or otherwise change our
vocations.


Pat
.-------------------------------------------------------------------.
|\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\
||\-----------------------------.-------------------------------------.
|\| Patrick Brian O'Connell ! Intermediate Writer,Eicon Technology|
.|| These are my opinions, not ! Corporation / (B) 514-631-9825 x3250|
\| Eicon Technology's. ! Net (B):patricko -at- eicon -dot- com |
'-----------------------------'-------------------------------------'


Previous by Author: OK, Frame's the obvious choice for long documents BUT...
Next by Author: FrameMaker: "obvious choice" redux
Previous by Thread: Re: FrameMaker: "obvious choice" redux
Next by Thread: Re: complaining directly to Frame


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads