TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: This = That From:Beverly Parks <bparks -at- HUACHUCA-EMH1 -dot- ARMY -dot- MIL> Date:Tue, 31 Jan 1995 09:57:57 MST
Since when is the questioning of word definition and usage a
"side trip" from technical writing? Gee, and I thought writing
was all about words...
bparks -at- huachuca-emh1 -dot- army -dot- mil
> Starting a political side trip, someone posted:
> If one is presumed innocent until proven guilty, and then in
> trial found to be not guilty, doesn't that make "not guilty"
> equal to "innocent"?
> The Scots have an interesting approach. The Jury has three choices to pick
> Guilty, Innocent, and Not Proven. (This last choice means that while the jury
> couldn't figure out if you were indeed innocent, the crown was not able to
> your guilt. The last two combined form the US's "Not Guilty" verdict. I think
> what the first poster was getting at is the belief that "Not Proven" is a long
> way from "Innocent." In the theory behind our society, we are supposed to
> that a "Not Guilty" verdict means "Innocent." The premise of an open and free
> society is that everyone is expected to be a good citizen, and no one must be
> hindered in any way without established proof. In our practice we are much
> than free and open; we tend to believe anyone -- or at least the majority --
> folks put on trial are guilty, regardless of proof, and therefore "Not Guilty"
> must mean they just got away with it, not that they were innocent. At root is
> the old back-fence standby, "there's no smoke without fire, I always say.")
> End of political side trip, back to Techwr business.