TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Grammar in College? From:SANDRA CHARKER <scharker -at- OZEMAIL -dot- COM -dot- AU> Date:Sun, 12 Feb 1995 15:13:53 +1100
Not so much about grammar as about usage...
I've noticed a few articles here recently that used 'one' as Kirsten Alexander
does in the following:
> One's writing improves over time and the brief span of high school
> is not enough time to develop into a finished writer.
Is this a trend in US usage? And if so, when is 'one' used?
a) I've thought for a long time that English could use 'one' to resolve the
s/h/it dilemma. But in this example, and in others that I've noticed but can't
quote right now, the "One" seems to be a formal replacement for something you
(I mean one) might call 'inclusive you'.
"One's writing improves over time..."
"Your writing improves over time..."
"Our writing improves over time..."
I can't see any difference in sense. Is there a difference in tone? What is it?
b) What is US English doing about s/h/it -- and let's leave the sewage jokes
with that other topic. In spoken Australian English, there's quite a strong
trend to using they as a singular. For example:
"As time passes, a writer realises that their high school work was not as good
as they thought at the time."
That's a bad example because the sentence reads more naturally with plural
writers; I'll find some better ones if anybody's interested. The usage is still
uncommon in writing, probably because it grates on the grammatically aware. I
myself recognise its utility, its common sense, and the parallel with 'you',
but I'll write a long, long way round to avoid it.