Re: Apology for Advertising Signature

Subject: Re: Apology for Advertising Signature
From: Karen Kay <karenk -at- NETCOM -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 15:48:59 -0800

John Gear said:
> You're absolutely right. And it was exceedingly poor form to have it
> attached to a post such as the one I made. My signature file is normally
> reserved for private correspondence. The only reason it *did* make it onto
> the public message is that I had to reload my mail program and failed to
> reset the default switch to "signature off." So I apologize for the error
> and have corrected the problem.

You may have corrected the problem, but now your posts are unsigned!
That's another kind of rudeness.

Karen
karenk -at- netcom -dot- com


Previous by Author: Re: Re[2]: Stefan Olson (fwd)
Next by Author: Re: a few questions
Previous by Thread: Apology for Advertising Signature
Next by Thread: Whose Fault is the Bandwidth Expended Over Ads?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads