TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Should we Worry? From:"Eric J. Ray" <ejray -at- OKWAY -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU> Date:Fri, 24 Feb 1995 08:40:13 -0600
Scott (and others),
Good question! It depends on a number of factors.
Generally, I assume that someone else will answer. If I
am not swamped, if it seems like a "problem" rather
than a lack of information, or if I can quickly and
easily do it, I'll reply.
Not to sound rude, but I'm more willing to take time to
answer people who don't have a starting place (such as
those who heard of the list and want more information)
than those who post to the list because they don't
have/cannot find the instructions or my address that
they already got once (get-me-off-this-list type
If I get personal mail, I always reply, and am happy to
ejray -at- okway -dot- okstate -dot- edu
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Should we Worry?
Author: SCLUFF -at- vax -dot- micron -dot- com at SMTP
Date: 2/23/95 11:59 AM
When people send messages to Techwr-L asking for help on how to subscribe
or unsubscribe, I always assume that someone else out there will reply. It's
not that I would mind replying; it's just that it seems like a waste to fill
someone's mailbox with multiple "here's how" replies. Coversely, I sometimes
wonder if anyone replies at all. Do you take care of replying to such
requests, or do you leave doing so up to us?