Re: The flaming of Dilbert

Subject: Re: The flaming of Dilbert
From: Howard <howardg -at- SAVVY -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 1995 12:01:27 -0500

Eric -

Thanks for posting the Dilbert reply (below).
Sounds like Scott Adams's reposone falls in the "SO, there!" category. LOL!!
FWIW, I relly enjoyed the series last year when the Dogbert Corp was
developing tech and mktg materials to apply for ISO accreditation; did
that series also cause a stir in this forum?? C'mon, gang. Lighten up!!

-- Howard howardg -at- savvy -dot- com

On Wed, 22 Mar 1995, Eric J. Ray wrote:

> FYI.
> Eric



> ______________________________ Forward Header
__________________________________
> Subject: The flaming of Dilbert
> Author: ScottAdams -at- aol -dot- com at SMTP
> Date: 3/21/95 9:57 PM


> Eric,

> Somebody on your list was nice enough to send me the text of the debate over
> my Dilbert cartoon featuring a tech writer. It was great reading. I was
> hoping you would be nice enough to post my response to the list.

> My response:

> This was the most negative response I've ever gotten from a strip. And
> probably the most entertaining. Consequently, I plan to introduce a tech
> writer character in the next few months who is a composite of some of the
> more interesting personalities I picked up from the list.

> God, I love my job.

> Scott Adams


Previous by Author: Re: Shhhh...
Next by Author: Re: Term "tech writing"
Previous by Thread: The flaming of Dilbert
Next by Thread: Re: The flaming of Dilbert


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads