TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:What's an SQA? From:Caryn Rizell <caryn -at- HPPTC95 -dot- ROSE -dot- HP -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 21 Apr 1995 10:04:18 PDT
I'm not familiar with SQA. Is that the same as
caryn -at- hpptc95 -dot- rose -dot- hp -dot- com
> If you equate the writer/reviewer relationship to an
> author/editor relationship, then the writer/author will usually
> have the final say.
> It sounds to me that your SQA person is maybe a closet editor,
> and that she (oops, or he) is using her/his position to
> demonstrate her/his perceived expertise.
> The role of SQA (according to Watts Humphrey, a recognized
> expert in the field) is to review products and processes for
> completeness and adherence to standards. The level at which your
> SQA person is "reviewing" your documents appears to be outside
> the scope of her/his responsibility. [Note: Her/his responsibilities
> as defined by your company may very well include this level of
> detail...but it usually doesn't.]