TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: THE MOST UNKINDEST CUT From:Paul Tarr <pwt -at- MINNIE -dot- BELL -dot- INMET -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 10 May 1995 18:17:47 -0700
On Wed, 10 May 1995, Michael LaTorra wrote:
> In the latest issue of TIME, an article about Congressional budget cuts
> is titled:
> THE MOST UNKINDEST CUT
> I've been seeing more and more typos and grammatical errors in magazine
> and book text these days, but I've never before seen such a blatant error in
> a title.
: stuff deleted
The above is certainly blatant and obvious. I get a chuckle out of
less obvious examples. One of my favorites is "factoid". What exactly is a
factoid? The dictionary defines the suffix oid to signify as or like
something but not the same as that something. I infer that a factoid must
be as or like a fact but not a fact! The only thing that I can think of
that is as or like a fact but not a fact is a plausible lie.
(pwt -at- minnie -dot- bell -dot- inmet -dot- com)